Thanks to all the responsers: fan@cns.nyu.edu Robert_E_Falen@raytheon.com Scott Lawson" <Scott.Lawson@manukau.ac.nz> Brad_Morrison@capgroup.com Tim Evans" <tkevans@tkevans.com> Dragan Cvetkovic" <me@privacy.net> Paul suggests to use LTO3 since it is available but the capacity double. >From Eric, suggest Overland robotic tape libraries or StorageTec robotoic tape libraries Eric stress "BE VERY sure the tape library you chose AND the interface HBA are supported by both the tape vendor and the software vendor". A very important point to make sure the compatbility among hardware and software. >From Scott, suggest sun L25(It's a Quantum ATL unit) Brad has very good comment on my question and here it is to share: ----------------------------------------- I can't really speak to the technical specs you posted without knowing what your backup requirements are, e.g., how much data needs to be backed up in what time window, etc. I recommend that you find out before you buy anything--it really sucks to have bought hardware that won't do what you need it to do. Look out for data growth, also, and build this into your proposal, i.e., include information on why this purchase will satisfy your current requirements, and forecast when you'll need to buy more. I can say that ufsdump will work with this autoloader, but you'll need to wrap it in a script: ufsdump, by itself, will prompt for another tape, but you can capture this request and act on it with simple mt(1) commands. You need a script that will catch ufsdump's request, tell the loader to change to the next tape, then tell ufsdump to continue. Several people have mentioned hostsdump.sh as a solution. I prefer to use Expect, which is free (nist.gov) and easy to use. The easiest way is to run Expect in "record" mode, then go through a sample session by hand. Then edit the resulting script to add variables. I strongly suggest using Amanda (amanda.org). It's a very robust backup solution, uses dump or tar, it's also free, and it has excellent support for holding disks: designate a large filesystem for Amanda to dump to, then let Amanda roll these dumps off to tape at your discretion. In this way, you make the best use of your tapes, and the urgent restore requests like "I need my directory tree to look just like it did yesterday" are satisfied by restoring from disk, not tape. The trade-off is that you'll have to tweak it pretty thoroughly to get it to do the typical incrementals-all-week-then-fulls-on-the-weekend schedule. Amanda out of the box will figure out its own backup schedule--workable, but probably not what you're used to. The good news is that there are several published modification sets for traditional backup schedules. Amanda recognizes *every*single*tape*machine out there--the contributors are constantly adding and updating its database of known machines and their behavior. The mailing list is very active, even moreso than sun-managers. Regarding the "next" tape problem with autoloaders: If this unit is a simple stacker, watch out for how it behaves when you get to the last tape. If it goes right to the first tape, you'll need tape labels or some other strategy to prevent over-writing a valid tape. If it's a robot, you're almost certainly safe, given that you're probably relying on barcodes--in that case, though, ufsdump + one or more scripts is probably not going to cut it. Amanda has support for bar codes, and it always writes its own label on file one of the tape. After that, it's just one dump (or tar archive) after another. I don't know of any other free backup software that does labelling. I just read up on the Magnum 1x7. Nice. Barcode support, and now they have an LT03 model. Final Opinion: Looks like a great machine. Make sure you have the software to drive it properly. ------------------------------------------ Dragan has similar configuration and use mtx and Amanda tools. the system we use mtx for loader controller (check http://mtx.badtux.net/) in combination with amanda backup program (http://www.amanda.org/). Both are free, but you have to tweak and write your own stuff. Beware that amanda doesn't do multi-volumes so if your backup doesn't fit onto a single tape, you have to find some other methods. Original question: To All Helpers: I am planning to implement tape autoloader LTO2 solution for system backup and would like to hear some successful or not so successful stories about your experience with autoloader vendors. I am planning to install it on V880 system running Solaris 2.8 and currently is studying Exabyte Magnum 1x7 LTO2 Tape Autoloader. (would like to know whether this is a good one for you or not if you use one before) The capacity that I am looking for is around 1.4TB native, 2.8 TB compressed mode. Also on the software side, I like to know whether I can use ufsdump to control the autoloader or I need to buy software program to do it. Thanks in advance. Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Mon Jul 25 16:03:23 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:50 EST