SUMMARY: Re: lo0 for virtual interface

From: George Kahler <george_at_yorku.ca>
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 10:08:28 EDT
Yura Pismerov <ypismerov@tucows.com>
"Michael Horton" <Michael.Horton@acntv.com>
"Aseltine, Dick" <dick.aseltine@centrepath.com>

all agree that this will work as is expected.

Thanks,
George

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:06:13 -0400 (EDT), George Kahler <george@yorku.ca> wrote:
> Does anyone see any problems with using the loopback for a virtual
> interface for apache load balancing ? I'm trying to avoid buying a
> second NIC.
> 
> Can lo0:1 ... can safely be used for this ?
> 
> I'm using Linux LVS and keepalive for load balancing and now I need to
> add Solaris 8 system to the cluster but I need to create a virtual
> interface on the Solaris system. I need for the machine NOT to ARP it
> out.
> 
> Thanks,
> George
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
Received on Tue Jun 28 10:33:30 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:49 EST