Thanks to the following members of this list for their prompt replies. Jon Hudson Jeff Barratt-McCartney Ddelija I have pasted the body of Jon Hudson's comprehensive reply below. In a well tuned SAN on local multimode fiber (62.5, <150m) all scsi requests should be processed (ECT;End completion Time) in under 500ms. Should be able to get down to 100ms often, but under 500ms is the target. Sometimes really low, Once you go to single mode (long haul) you start having scsi time out issues. You limitation ends up being between 120-220miles depending on equipment. This is just due to physics limitation of fibre. Now, you can of course have devices in there that allow multi-hop synchronous replication, but it's only for replication. Now in a test lab I saw a Nishan box in CA allow hosts to mount disk in NY. But the Nishan had to buffer and cache everything so they could deal with all the timeout issues. I can't remember what scsi times out at, I'd have to check. But most solutions I've seen are under 120miles. As far a comparing internal drives to FC disk array, that really depends on what the internal drives are. Fiber channel drives do really well either internal or external as long as you are dealing with good size data sets in that can be carved up into neat 2048 frames. Basic scsi can out run fiber channel when dealing with lots of really small files. FC ends up having to pad the 2048 frame causing addition interrupts on the hba. I feel pretty safe saying in most cases a 2Gb attached array tuned properly with 10k drives will out perform any internal or scsi attached scsi array. But I could construct special cases with really small files where this isn't true. You know how it works, you can always construct a niche test that will prove your point =) So for example an v880 with internal FC drives can perform well since it's fiber, but now as well as an external array because it's FCAL (loop) and not FCSW (switched). But with the right equipment you "should" be able to do several kilometers and be ok, but I'm not sure of the performance numbers. We (Finisar) make long haul single mode SFPs that can do 80Km without a repeater that might work. But you are probably best off getting Brocade and Nishan (now own by McData) to show you their solutions. Don't talk to Cisco, their FC stuff sucks. Make sure you spend the time to properly tune the credit buffers, this can make or kill long haul stuff. Thanks, Conor -----Original Message----- From: Conor Svensson Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:51 PM To: 'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org' Subject: Solaris & Veritas SAN question Hi, We are looking to implement a large scale SPARC Solaris system which has two main priorities. 1. Disk latency - ie fastest possible return of any calls to disk IO 2. Failover to remove site I am investigating using a Veritas to manage a SAN mirror of Fibre Channel disk arrays. The application writes relatively little data. Does anyone know how attaching a FC mirror several kilometres away will affect the disk i/o latency? How does the i/o latency of an internal disk compare to that of a tuned FC disk array? I will summarise, thanks in advance, Conor ___________________________________________________________ Evolution is the investment banking and venture capital industry's first choice for practical advice on strategy, business process and the application of advanced technology. Conor Svensson Direct: +44 (0) 20 7898 0348 Evolution Tel: +44 (0) 20 7664 6640 Peninsular House Fax: +44 (0) 20 7664 6641 30-36 Monument Street London EC3R 8LJ Email: <mailto:Conor.Svensson@evolution.net> Conor.Svensson@evolution.net United Kingdom URL: <http://www.evolution.net/> http://www.evolution.net ___________________________________________________________ The information in this Internet e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is unauthorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Evolution or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact Evolution, London, +44 (0) 20 7664 6640 ___________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Mon Jan 17 08:15:35 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:42 EST