SUMMARY: can not configure dmfe1 on a V100 ... ???

From: German, Vinnie <Vgerman_at_us.nomura.com>
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 08:52:57 EST
	Special thanks to:

	Christophe Dupre [duprec@scorec.rpi.edu]  who came up with the
answer below.
	Also 
	Glass, David (UDB) [GlassD@bp.com]

	Harrington, David B. (Contractor) (DSCR) [David.Harrington@dla.mil]
( David was pretty straight to the point) 



A quick check at the ifconfig output shows that your two interfaces have
different netmasks. In particular, dmfe2 has a netmask of fffffff0, which
is 255.255.255.240. With that netmask, you seem to be trying to use subnet
198.191.100.192/28, where:
subnet		198.191.100.192
broadcast	198.191.100.207
available addr	198.191.100.193 - 198.191.100.206


	HERE IS MY ORIGINAL QUESTION:


> Hello Managers:
> 
> I have a V100 which has two network port dmfe0 and dmfe1.
> 
> dmfe0 is coming up without any problem at all but dmfe1 is not coming up.
> Here is what the server is displaying when coming up:
> 
> Sun Fire V100 (UltraSPARC-IIe 500MHz), No Keyboard
> OpenBoot 4.0, 1152 MB memory installed, Serial #51701605.
> Ethernet address 0:3:ba:14:e7:65, Host ID: 8314e765.
> 
> 
> 
> Executing last command: boot                                          
> Boot device: disk0:a  File and args: 
> SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_108528-15 64-bit
> Copyright 1983-2001 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> configuring IPv4 interfaces: dmfe0ifconfig: SIOCGLIFADDR: dmfe1: Cannot
> assign requested address
>  dmfe1.
> Hostname: nyeqmdntick1
> metainit: nyeqmdntick1: there are no existing databases
> 
> NOTICE: dmfe0: PHY 1 link up 100 Mbps Full-Duplex
> NOTICE: dmfe1: PHY 1 link up 100 Mbps Full-Duplex
> The system is coming up.  Please wait.
> checking ufs filesystems
> /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s4: is clean.
> /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s3: is clean.
> 2/20/2003 21:13:53 GMT LOM time reference
> starting rpc services: rpcbind done.
> Setting netmask of dmfe0 to 255.255.255.0
> Setting default IPv4 interface for multicast: add net 224.0/4: gateway
> nyeqmdntick1
> syslog service starting.
> Print services started.
> volume management starting.
> starting NetWorker daemons:
> 
> If you look at what's in red you will think both port are coming up but
> when I do a "ifconfig -a" this
> is what I'm getting:
> 
> ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
>         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
> dmfe0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
>         inet 147.85.102.71 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 147.85.102.255
>         ether 0:3:ba:14:e7:65 
> dmfe1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
>         inet 198.191.100.192 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 198.191.100.255
>         ether 0:3:ba:14:e7:66 
> 
> NOTICE HOW dmfe1 IS NOT COMING UP.
> 
> I had change the eeprom setting "local-mac-address" from falso to true and
> still doing same thing.
> 
> Your comments will be very appreciated,
> Thanks in advance,
> Vinnie 
> 
-----  This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If
you receive this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your
system, destroy any hard copies and notify the sender. You must not,
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part
of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Nomura Holding
America Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc, and their respective
subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications
through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorized to state the views of such entity. Unless otherwise stated,
any pricing information in this message is indicative only, is subject to
change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any
reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
Received on Fri Feb 21 09:03:56 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:03 EST