Hi Managers, Thanks very much to the following for their collective wisdom: Mark Bergman AP Joe Fletcher Ed Kerekes Hichael Morton Yura Pismerov Matthias Gocht Alan Pae For 1. VxVM is NOT strictly necessary to use VCS, although it is said to be easy enough to use. For 2. VxFS is also NOT necessary, with UFS having come along quite a bit; it might suit certain requirements well enough. One reply was that a VxFS filesystem would failover faster than a UFS one. For 3. Veritas Foundation Suite/HA consists of the 3 said items, but having said that, whether that is the right item to get, would depend on the necessity for VxVM and VxFS For 4. Not much comments about it, but some replies have mentioned not using SANPoint in their clusters and not having any problems either. There was mention of looking into Sun Cluster instead, and the single-point-of-contact benefits as far as support was concerned. I will definitely look into that possibility, if my storage is also Sun branded. On the hardware front, T3 didn't score too badly, one reply mentioned the limit of 2 LUNs per T3; which might limit it's usefulness in a SAN setup. I have to pore through the T3 specs in detail to see if it has been addressed, as I recall reading something about this limit as well on the Sun website. Other suggestions included sitting a pair of A1000s between the 2 servers and mirroring it, the Sun StorEdge 3310, EMC Clariion FC and CX series of storage, Storageworks MA8000. One also mentioned saving costs on hardware raid by using VxVM. NetApp filer with a gigabit ethernet pipe was also mentioned; although this being used to hold mail boxes and mail spool - I tend to avoid NFS for this kind of thing. All in less than 24 hours too, my first reply came in within an hour. Thanks to all! Best Regards Jeffrey Original question follows: === Hi Managers, I have been looking at the Veritas site trying to figure out how all the Vx* stuff works together. Basically I need to put together 2 Sun boxes + shared storage in an active/passive setup for HA. Services to HA-ize are mail (Sendmail, imapd) and apache, the storage will hold user mailboxes. So far I've figured that I need Veritas Cluster Server, but from there it's all question marks: 1. Do I require VxVM? It seems that VCS needs to "import" disk resources during the failover process, must the disk resources be managed with VxVM? 2. Do I require VxFS? I don't forsee much allocation/reallocation of disk space, nor dynamic growing or shrinking of filesystems 3. Is the Veritas Foundation Suite/HA the product I should get? I assume it's comprised of VxVM, VxFS and VCS 4. I've read mention of Veritas SANPoint, assuming I'm running an active/passive cluster, ie. only one node writes to disk at any time; is this still required? The hardware I've identified so far is the V480; does anyone have experiences on what storage to use? My current requirement is for not much storage (50GB up to 500GB), but I would like this storage to be "pluggable" into a SAN infrastructure later; will the T3 be a good candidate for this? Would be most grateful for any advise and answers, I will summarise. _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Wed Jan 15 23:02:31 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:01 EST