Thanks to Ivan, This seems to be a know bug with Sun, after modifying /etc/pam.conf as described below all work fine. SOLUTION/FIX: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > We have definitely seen this with Solaris 9 clients and NIS running in > secure mode. Indeed the client never asks for the passwd.adjunct.byname > map. The bug from Sun says: > <begin pasted bug> > 4670947 > logins failing when NIS is backend for authentication > 18 Sep 2002 > > Category: pam > Subcategory: unix_scheme > State: integrated > Description: see Comments > Work Around: > russell.blaine@sun.com 2002-06-03 > > Replace these three lines in /etc/pam.conf: > other auth required pam_authtok_get.so.1 > other auth required pam_dhkeys.so.1 > other auth required pam_unix_auth.so.1 > > with this line: > other auth required pam_unix.so.1 > > russell.blaine@sun.com 2002-07-23 > > C2 security is preserved with this workaround. > > <end pasted bug> > > Sun also sent me another copy of paswdutil.so.1 to place in /usr/lib > (wonder if this is just from the latest release of Solaris 8) which also > works, and they say the new passwdutil.so.1 also doesn't break C2 > security. > PROBLEM: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > hello, > > > > Does someone has seen this problem? and know how to fix? > > > > Situation > > master Solaris 8/Sparc, with shadow/secure support enabled > > client Solaris 9/Sparc, problem > > client Solaris 8/Sparc, work OK > > > > what does work > > su - user OK this is a user in NIS > > ypwhich OK shows the correct server > > ypcat passwd.byname OK data correct > > ypcat passwd.adjunct.byname OK data correct > > > > what does not work > > any user can not login as the password is not accepted! > > and a snoop shows that the client ask for passwd.byname > > but i do never see the passwd.adjunct.byname.. > > > > snoop with the other working client i do see passwd.byname > > and then passwd.adjunct.byname > > > > note > > the system was jumpstarted with the lastest version of JASS > > so not sure if that is an issue... > > -- Kind regards, Luc Suryo _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Sat Sep 28 14:51:10 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:55 EST