On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 11:41, Sal Serafino wrote: > In some DHCP threads a few weeks ago it was summarized that > Solaris-8's native DHCP is the way to go and it better that > ISC, so I don't know what to believe. I'd normally only reply to Mr. Serafino, but I wanted to make sure that the above statement be "revisited" on the list c/o my previous summary (which I believe he is referring to): http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/sunmanagers/2002-July/015101.html Specifically: 'Several people confirmed that Solaris 2.8 10/01 and later are working flawlessly for them. Installing all post-10/01 DHCP patches is also recommended. Most are impressed with the GUI administration tools in these late DHCP server releases which seem to make administration easier than ISC's DHCP server "single, flat config file" setup.' I don't think I said it is "better than ISC" just that other people said Sun DHCP GUI tools "make administration easier." I, myself, am sticking with ISC's server. In fact, the only reason I gave the Sun DHCP server a consideration was because I had just taken the Sun SCNA exam where it comprised of a good 10% of the test. Which led to my Sun Manager's post. -- Bryan -- Bryan J. Smith, E.I. mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org Engineering/IT Prof http://www.SmithConcepts.com --------------------------------------------------- CompTIA A+ Linux+ Server+ 2001 i-Net+ Network+ 2002 Novell CNA 6 Sun SCSA SCWSE SCNA 8 _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Thu Aug 1 13:32:32 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:50 EST