All, I got four responses to my inquiry. One was for SRM, one was sorta sitting on the fence, one was against SRM, and lastly a request to summarize. SRM is not a part of Solaris 8, but it is available for download. SRM will come as a part of Solaris 9. Basically, SRM implementation will require Solaris 8 patches and is not straight forward. The use of SRM may be worthwhile if one has the time to learn how to set it up properly; else, one would probably be better off using scripts and native Solaris commands. Attached below are the responses and original post. On Apr 9, 2002 Jeffrey Liu (jliu2@hanwave.net) wrote: jeff> jeff> My company is considering using SRM - Solaris Resource Manager. Cool. jeff> I've heard that SRM is complicated, can trash your system, jeff> may impact Oracle performance by 10% to 30%, but it jeff> can also offer administrator control of workload CPU shares. Nope, nope and nope. The biggest drawback is you have to pay for it now but it is free w/ Solaris 9. Attached is a presentation I did for a customer on SRM and a whitepaper on SRM (Its PostScript) -jed We use in on some E4500's with Solaris 2.6. It's a royal pain in the a**, and it complicates matters unduly. It also creates *huge* /var/adm/messages files, since every login/logout generates an entry. It also moves all users into a different class, so you cannot "renice" processes on the system without jumping through priocntl hoops. Avoid it if you can. Just my $0.02, YMMV. Tom Jeffrey Liu <jliu2@hanwave.net> 04/09/02 10:34 AM To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org@SMTP@cchntmsd cc: Subject: SRM - how many of you use it? My company is considering using SRM - Solaris Resource Manager. I've heard that SRM is complicated, can trash your system, may impact Oracle performance by 10% to 30%, but it can also offer administrator control of workload CPU shares. Question: How many of you actually have this running in production environments? What issues (performance or otherwise) have you run into? Thanks in advance, Jeff _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers We are using SRM for a shared server product we have out. The customer buys an IP, and then gets a amount of space and bandwidth on the server. Some things that we have run into - on Solaris 8 there are some patches that SUN has for SRM now, apply them! We had SRM causing system hangs, where the only way we could get the server to respond was issuing a break at the console. Some notes on the set up - Memeory allocations are hard. We are using Apache and Tomcat - when the customer compiles Tomcat, they need more memory than is allocated. There is 2Gb of memory in the boxes, so to get around this, we allow a customer to take 1Gb of memeory. The 1Gb limit makes sure that no one customer can hog the box. In general, except for compiles, this is never an issue. The box has all customer data on an external A1000. In general, log files are owned by root, so that the logs do not count against the customer's quota. FYI, SRM is going to come as part of Solaris 9. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Andrew Stueve | Office 703-886-2606 Team Lead/Sr. Engineer | Worldcom | Pager 1-888-454-7594 ---------------------------------------------------- > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:34:13 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jeffrey Liu <jliu2@hanwave.net> > To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org> > Subject: SRM - how many of you use it? > > > My company is considering using SRM - Solaris Resource Manager. > > I've heard that SRM is complicated, can trash your system, > may impact Oracle performance by 10% to 30%, but it > can also offer administrator control of workload CPU shares. > > Question: How many of you actually have this running in > production environments? What issues (performance or otherwise) > have you run into? > > Thanks in advance, > Jeff > > > > --__--__-- My company is considering using SRM - Solaris Resource Manager. I've heard that SRM is complicated, can trash your system, may impact Oracle performance by 10% to 30%, but it can also offer administrator control of workload CPU shares. Question: How many of you actually have this running in production environments? What issues (performance or otherwise) have you run into? Thanks in advance, Jeff _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Thu Apr 11 23:28:39 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:40 EST