Wow, what a wild goose chase I've been to. Turns out one CPU was bad on the 280R in question. It actually took running SunVTS on it to finally discover what was wrong. Okay .. from now on, it'll be a rule of thumb to run SunVTS before evrything else.... ;o) N. > -----Original Message----- > From: Caparroso, Nelson T. (AAS) > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:32 AM > To: 'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org' > Subject: Solaris 10/01: df -k shows erratic stats > > In connection with an earlier post (see below), I reinstalled the system > with no disksuite on it and am still getting erroneous df -k stats on my > mount points (note 1051% capacity). > > # df -k > Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on > /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s0 4129290 808440 3279558 1051% / > /proc 0 0 0 0% /proc > fd 0 0 0 0% /dev/fd > mnttab 0 0 0 0% /etc/mnttab > /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s3 4129290 8290 4079708 1% /var > swap 5874592 8 5874584 1% /var/run > swap 5874632 48 5874584 1% /tmp > > Any Ideas? The system seem to be working normally 'cept for the > misleading/erroneous df -k stats. > > > Nelson > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Caparroso, Nelson T. (AAS) > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:31 PM > To: 'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org' > Subject: SDS 4.2.1 - Patch 108693-07 or Sol8 10/01 - Anyone Having > Problems? > > List: > > Solaris 8, 10/01 with the very freshest patch cluster AND 108693-07 (do I > need this?). I also have VxVM3.1.1 patch03 and VxFS3.4 on it. I am using > SDS to manage my bootdisk (mirrored with another bootdisk) and also to > create "soft partitions" in the large space" between slice 3 (/var) and > slice 6 (my metadb slice). We've standardised a partitioning scheme of > only 2 UFS partitions (large / 4gb and /var 4gb, swap is 4gb) and we'd > like to utilize the space I've mentioned. With soft partitions, we can > "chop up" this space into several soft partitions. With 36 GB system > FC-disks being shipped these days, we actually have around 20+Gb of > "choppable/soft-partionable" space using SDS. > > And I am having a weird behaviour just about after loading data into these > partitions. df -k shows erratic capacity pctgs and sar -d and iostat -xcn > report weird stats as well (but everything is fine 'cept these stats). An > excerpt of my erratic df -k (note d30 and d103): > > Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on > /dev/md/dsk/d30 4129290 2417540 1670458 105122% / > /proc 0 0 0 0% /proc > fd 0 0 0 0% /dev/fd > mnttab 0 0 0 0% /etc/mnttab > /dev/md/dsk/d33 4129290 94371 3993627 3% /var > swap 5814952 16 5814936 1% /var/run > swap 524288 32 524256 1% /tmp > /dev/md/dsk/d100 2097152 962056 1126248 47% /oracle8i > /dev/md/dsk/d104 1048576 575920 469000 56% /oracle > /dev/md/dsk/d103 1048576 16640 1023888 3302147% /system2 > /dev/md/dsk/d101 2097152 587824 1497592 29% /remedy > /dev/md/dsk/d102 1048576 16744 1023776 2% /oratools > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars01 1048576 16640 1023888 2% /ars01 > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars03 1048576 16640 1023888 2% /ars03 > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars02 1048576 16640 1023888 2% /ars02 > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars04 1048576 16640 1023888 2% /ars04 > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars05 4194304 16736 4144944 1% /ars05 > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/ars06 4194304 16736 4144944 1% /ars06 > /dev/md/dsk/d105 1048576 16640 1023888 2% /system > /dev/md/dsk/d106 5242880 16768 5185296 1% /oraxport > /dev/vx/dsk/d1000/backup 8388608 16864 8306352 1% /backup > > > I'd galdly summarize for the list my findings... > > > Nelson _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagersReceived on Fri Jan 11 14:04:14 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:42:32 EST