Hi all:
I get only two answers about Sunlink X25 9.0 (it seems that isn't very
popular).
One recommends me a patch that I have been already download a long time
ago (I have installed patches for TCP 103447-10, IP 103169-13, X-25 V9.0
103068-12 and OSI V8.1 103056-10).
The other is very simple, move to V9.1 .That's something we will do, but
now isn't the right time.
Anyway thakyou very much to steeve@peachy.com
and tacoh@gv-nmc.unisource.nl
P.D. :If somebody has any other idea, send it (I'll have no problem at
all)
(The original post is at the end)
See you ~:)@=
**************************************************************************
*************************************************
steeve@peachy.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
I'm using 9.1 at a very large telecoms provider in the UK. Not having
such
trouble. Note that you MUST go to 9.1 as it's the only version which is
certified as Year 2000 compliant.......
Steve.
**************************************************************************
*************************************************
tacoh@gv-nmc.unisource.nl
----------------------------------------------------------------
Did you load patch 103068-11 (or later)?
---------------------------------------------
**************************************************************************
*************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: dratto@nec.com.ar <dratto@nec.com.ar>
To: sun-managers@ra.mcs.anl.gov <sun-managers@ra.mcs.anl.gov>
Date: 14 May 1998 07:55
>Hello:
> I would like to know if somebody has have any headaches before with
>Sunlink X25 V9.0 for sparc sun4m in Solaris 2.5, because I been have
>some with them.
> We configure the functionality of IP transport over X25 with the
X25tool
>provided.
> It seems that when there is no activity on the link (after a few days)
>the transport for IP on X25 falls, and we have to enter the remote host
>with a PAD and reinitiate the stack, in order to make the IP available
>again. No core files are generated and the deamon stays the same, all we
>do is stop it and start it and everything starts working again. We try
>adjusting the more common parameters (for instance the NSDU, Window
Size,
>Packet Size, some timers, etc.), but stills the same.
>
> I would appreciate any sugestion, comment, trace or anything that could
>be useful.
>
>PD:promess I'll summarize.
>
> Thank you all in advance!!
>
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Daniel A. Ratto
Hardware and Software Development Department
Technology Division
*************************************************************
****************NEC Argentina S.A**********************
*************************************************************
Av. San Martin 5020 (1602) Florida
Bs. As - Argentina
Phone: (541) 730-6062
Fax: (541) 730-6060
e-mail: dratto@nec.com.ar
neclist@hotmail.com
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:12:40 CDT