My original question:
We have an E3000 running Solaris 2.5.1. I need to install Oracle on
it. I have five 9Gb disks reserved for Oracle's database files. All
five disks are on the same controller.
I'm undecided about putting these disks into a RAID-5 array or not.
If I don't, then my disks would be five filesystems, each containing
the database files. If I do, then (I suppose) I'd have a single,
large, filesystem, containing fewer (but larger) Oracle database files.
Does anyone have any experience with Oracle on RAID arrays? Is it
faster having a single, large filesystem with just one or two database
files? Or is it better having them split up, even though all disks are
on the same controller?
I received eight responses. The vast majority indicated that RAID-5
is unsuitable for Oracle database use and suggested using either RAID-0
or RAID0+1 instead.
Cost prohibits me from using either of those options, so I'll just
stick with four separate filesystems. I'll use the fifth disk as a
hot spare. It's not perfect but it'll reduce my database outage time
from a disk crash to a minimum.
Thanks to Bhaba R. Misra, Bruce Cheng, Jason Marshall, John Malick,
Peter Asboeck, Mike Youngberg, Laust Frederiksen and Glenn Satchell
for the responses.
Gilbert Laustsen Jung Associates Ltd.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:11:59 CDT