In article <tnemeth.93.00546EEB@immuno.imvs.sa.gov.au>, tnemeth@immuno.imvs.sa.gov.au (Tom Nemeth) writes:
>>127.0.0.0 localhost
>>141.241.4.36 myhost
>>141.241.160.8 myhost-1
>
>>This should then resolve any conflicts in addressing.
>
>On the right track, but it won't work properly. Somewhere in the manual it
>says that you must have the SAME HOST NUMBER on both networks. So, the above
>example must be changed to:
>
>127.0.0.0 localhost
>141.241.4.36 myhost
>141.241.160.36 myhost-1
No. It has some advantages for administration, esp. if you have more than two
subnets hanging off a file server, like
141.241.104.36 myhost-104 myhost
141.241.160.36 myhost-160 myhost
141.241.189.36 myhost-189 myhost
but it definitively runs (tested with sun3, sun4 from 3.5 to 4.1.3) otherwise.
E.g. if you use the loer number to indicate the subnet a two-footet Sun routes
to :
>141.241.104.160 myhost-104 myhost
>141.241.160.104 myhost-160 myhost
-- Eckhard R"uggeberg eckhard@ts.go.dlr.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:09:16 CDT