Re: SUMMARY: Solaris 2.2 licensing

From: John Navitsky (johnn@eskimo.com)
Date: Thu Jun 17 1993 - 11:14:44 CDT

In reply to: Anthony A. Datri: "Re: SUMMARY: Solaris 2.2 licensing"
Next in thread: Per Abrahamsen: "Re: SUMMARY: Solaris 2.2 licensing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Note: I've trimmed the follow-ups.

In article <...> aad@scr.siemens.com (Anthony A. Datri) writes:

>>Perhaps not coincidently, Sun doesn't seem to like X terminals and doesn't
>>sell them; on the other hand, Hewlett-Packard is a leading X terminal vendor
>>and sells them quite successfully. :-)

>The ads for them are very misleading, though.

No joke. The one indicating the HP X Terminal is the same as the Sun work-
station is classic.

-- 
 ,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,
 ,`,`John Navitsky`,`,`,`,`Exercise a right today,`,`,`,`,johnn@eskimo.com`,`,
 ,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,

In reply to: Anthony A. Datri: "Re: SUMMARY: Solaris 2.2 licensing"
Next in thread: Per Abrahamsen: "Re: SUMMARY: Solaris 2.2 licensing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:07:56 CDT