I asked in an earlier posting whether the sun4m architecture needed a special
version of rpc.mountd - this was in connection with patch 100296-04.
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 14 09:40 1992 100296-04/sun4/
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun4/4.1.3/
> rwxr-x---559/500 32768 Sep 4 01:25 1992 100296-04/sun4/4.1.3/rpc.mountd
> rwxrwxrwx559/500 0 Sep 21 16:52 1992 100296-04/sun4/4.1.1 symbolic link to4.1.2
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun4/4.1.2/
> rwxr-x---559/500 32768 Sep 4 01:25 1992 100296-04/sun4/4.1.2/rpc.mountd
> rwxr-x---559/500 1468 Sep 4 01:25 1992 100296-04/README
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun3/
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun3/4.1.1/
> rwxr-x---559/500 32768 Sep 4 01:25 1992 100296-04/sun3/4.1.1/rpc.mountd
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun4m/
> rwxr-s---559/500 0 Sep 4 10:54 1992 100296-04/sun4m/4.1.2/
> rwxr-x---559/500 32768 Sep 4 01:25 1992 100296-04/sun4m/4.1.2/rpc.mountd
>
> Notice the separate version for sun4m for SunOS 4.1.2 - but not for 4.1.3. I
> checked, and cmp reports that the two versions for 4.1.2 are *not* identical.
> However, rpc.mountd does not use libkvm or anything like that, and the what
> command reports the same for all the sun4 and sun4m versions. So I wonder:
The consensus of the answers I received was clearly that the sun4m uses the
same rpc.mountd as the rest. We are now up and running 4.1.3 on our MP-670,
with patch 100296-04 installed (100296-04/sun4/4.1.3/rpc.mountd from the above
listing), and everything seems to work just fine.
Thanks to the net for speedy answers!
Steinar Haug, system/networks administrator
SINTEF DELAB, University of Trondheim, NORWAY
Email: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no,
sthaug@idt.unit.no, steinar@tosca.er.sintef.no
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:07:21 CDT