Greetings,
Well, it seems I changed the wrong dump parameter! Most of you who are
successfully using Exabyte 8500 drives with dump doubled the Exabyte 8200 size
parameter, rather than the density parameter. Here's a reply which sums things
up nicely:
This is what we use for an 8500:
dump 0udsbf 54000 13000 126 /dev/nrst8 blah
For an 8200 we use this:
dump 0udsbf 54000 6000 126 /dev/nrst0 blah
Note that the size has been increased in the ratio 5:2.3 approx.
regards,
--
Glenn Satchell ups!glenn@fourx.Aus.Sun.COM |
Uniq Professional Services Pty Ltd ACN 056 279 335 | "The answer is no,
PO Box 70, Paddington, NSW 2021, (Sydney) Australia | and I'll negotiate
Phone: +61-2-360-7434 Fax: +61-2-331-2572 | from there."
"Sun Accredited System Consultants" |
My thanks to Glenn and these others who took the time to answer "an easy
one!"
Ed Arnold (era@niwot.scd.ucar.EDU)
Donald Ballance <donald@mech.glasgow.ac.uk>
Tom Conroy <trc@NSD.3Com.COM>
Steve Elliott <se@computing.lancaster.ac.uk>
Halvard Halvorsen (halvard@trd.sdata.no)
Daniel Strick (dan@bellcore.com)
Birger A. Wathne (birger@vest.sdata.no)
Regards,
Dave Edwards
MITRE Corp.
davee@mitre.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:06:53 CDT